Home News Features Arts & Entertainment Opinion Photo Comics Classifieds SCAN






digitalartsstudio_web.jpg

mplwebad.jpg


The writer who doesn’t read

This post was written by on May 24, 2011

Malee Moua, arts and entertainment editor.

I’ve never met Dorian Gray. Didn’t hang out with any of the “Little Women.” In the 11th grade, I was assigned to read Hemingway’s “A Farewell to Arms” and Vonnegut’s “Slaughterhouse-Five.”

I SparkNotes-ed both.

The gasps from my literature professors and peers when I’ve admitted this haunt me in my sleep. No, not really, but it’s embarrassing when my more scholarly writing peers wax poetic on Proust’s use of involuntary memory, while I chew the fat on how unabashedly “Michael Cera-y,” Michael Cera came across in last August’s issue of “Rolling Stone.”

I haven’t read the classics, nor am I an avid reader. I once overheard a fellow writing student talk about books the way I would talk about clothes. He said he could never leave the bookstore without purchasing two or three books. I began to worry that my nonexistent love of literature meant I was in the wrong major.

I don’t have an insatiable thirst for the written word, and I don’t plow through books. To give you an idea of my reading style, I’ve been trying to finish Kazuo Ishiguro’s “Never Let Me Go” for over a year now.

I’m a short form kind of gal. If we go all the way back to why I’m majoring in writing, it’s because I love reading and writing poetry. I always have. I could tell you that my favorite E. E. Cummings poem begins with “being to timelessness as it’s to time.” I could tell you about the one stanza in Jeffrey McDaniel’s “The Benjamin Franklin of Monogamy” that always brings me to tears. And I could tell you how Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech nurtured my love for anaphora and metaphor.

I have tried. After I graduated high school, I felt so bad about my skimpy English career that I set out to complete “To Kill a Mockingbird” and “Catcher in the Rye.” The former is now one of my favorite novels. As for the latter, I didn’t really understand all of the fuss.

Some may see this as a backwards way to create art, because how can I produce good work when I haven’t read the books deemed “classic”? It’s not because I feel that they wouldn’t be of any value to me. It’s because, well, novels are really long. I know that makes me sound, dare I say, unintelligent and lazy, but I’m simply not interested. I truly wish I was, but I’m not. I hope that doesn’t make me a bad writer.

I came to school here because of my love for the free-spirited poetic form, but I quickly learned that SCAD was not the school for fiction writing. I was initially disheartened by this, but strangely enough, this uncommon curriculum led me to my love of creative nonfiction. Without even knowing or planning it, my nearly blasphemous writing background has found the perfect home to flourish.

  • Kristin

    I really enjoyed reading this article.

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Anonymous

    Neat! I like hearing perspectives like this. You might identify with Kate Harding, who wrote a similar piece for Salon some time ago: http://bit.ly/h8Q7bK

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Moua

     This is great! Thank you for the link!

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://twitter.com/yogawriter Yoga Writer

    I too have a love/hate relationship with literary fiction. It is a necessary evil for me. I endure it because I have to. I’ve only met a few new world-minded instructors who don’t think that reading the classics is the path to becoming a great writer. I don’t enjoy reading classical literature and critiquing it, attempting to ascertain what an author thought or meant when writing their piece of work. I don’t mind critical reading, but good writers and good writing is subjective.
     
    I came to this program because it didn’t look like a traditional literature program, and to some extent I was correct. There are still those traditional figures here that rely on the past to teach the future, and sometimes it works. I get it. I guess it depends on your exposure, and it is my experience that there are many contemporary authors that teach me as much, if not more, than some classical authors. I am inspired by those teachers here who recognize that they are not reaching some through classics, and vary their strategy, intertwining classics with contemporary, and having an even greater impact. That is what makes this program special! Variety!
     
    Malee, thanks for having the courage to express your opinion. I hope it makes you feel better to know that there are others out there, me, who love writing and everything it encompasses, but don’t share that love of classical literature. I’m tired of academia lumping writing and literature together as if writing cannot exist without literature. Maybe that is so in academic settings, but in business & professional writing, the only thing that matters is writing, not what Mellville thought when he crafted Bartleby. I appreciate that in this program, we do study some contemporary authors in conjunction with the classical authors and that our writing isn’t dependent upon our classical literature resume.

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0